Poker Levels

Posted onby admin

A level two player thinks about an opponent’s cards and what he or she could be doing based on pre-flop actions and certain board textures. This is the category that the vast majority of regular players will fall into at the micros. This is also generally the lowest level.

  1. Level Up video poker puts an emphasis on video poker players who can put together winning streaks. For each win that you get, the multiplier for the following hand rises. You can end up with multipliers up to eight times your win if you can make a winning streak of four hands in a row.
  2. Poker: Players earn 100 reward points for every USD $1 paid in rake in Zoom or cash games or other tournament fees. And you will be moved to a lower Chest level. If you are at level 2 or higher and your progress bar expires when over 50% filled, you will receive a Chest from your new, lower level.

Earlier today Robert Woolley mentioned Tommy Angelo’s excellent book Elements of Poker. That got me thinking of one of the first poker books that I remember reading, No Limit Hold’em: Theory and Practice by the brilliant David Sklansky and the equally adept Ed Miller.

Poker

The book as a whole is very good, but there is one section that I remember vividly, the chapter on multiple-level thinking.

According to Sklansky and Miller, there are six levels to a poker player’s thinking, which confusingly starts at Level 0. This lowly level is reserved for complete amateurs — or perhaps someone who is blind drunk — and basically says “I know nothing about poker!” We’d love to play against Level 0 thinkers all day long, wouldn’t we?

Meanwhile, Level 1 is the base level of thinking for poker players and basically consists of knowing what your hand is. Again, like Level 0, this level of thinking is extremely basic and thinking like this will result in losses against the vast majority of players a Level 1 thinker encounters.

A large section of poker players fall into the Level 2 category, which finds the player asking the question “What does my opponent have?” At this level of thinking, players are aware of what their own hand beats and start to give thought to what their opponent’s hand strength is. The majority at this level are still losing players, but at least they are progressing the right way up the multiple-level thinking ladder.

Once you hit Level 3, things start to become a little complicated (although some may say more interesting). If you are a Level 3 thinker, whenever you’re involved in a hand you will be wondering to yourself, “What does my opponent think I have?” and trying to play your hand based on how your hand strength is perceived by your opponents.

Level 3 players are generally more situationally aware and will often bluff in optimal spots rather than marginal ones, thanks to being able also to project a range of hands onto those around them. The slight difference from a Level 2 thinker to a Level 3 can often be the difference of being a losing player to a winning one.

Now before we continue, I have to ask if you are sitting down because this is where matters really start to become tricky. To reach Level 4 you need to be asking yourself, “What does my opponent think that I think he has?” It sounds complicated, and it is, and even if you are thinking on this level it is unlikely any of your opponents are anyway!

Level 5 is reserved only for the elite thinkers in the game and will be almost useless for us mere mortals, but for completeness’ sake I will let you know what is involved in Level 5 thinking. Have you ever played a hand and thought to yourself, “What does my opponent think that I think he thinks I have?” No? I thought not! Seems ridiculous, doesn’t it? Yet there will be some battles taking place right now where players are thinking on that high level, on another plane than the rest of us.

The key to success is to figure out what level of thinking your opponents are on and then come up with a strategy to combat them that they will understand. There is little point in adopting an approach that only a Level 4 thinker will understand if you are trying to apply it to players who only care that they have a pair of fours in their hand and about nothing else.

Thinking one, possibly two in some cases, levels above your opponent should give you a substantial edge against them — just don’t overcomplicate matters and out “level” yourself!

Photo © BrokenSphere / Wikimedia Commons (adapted), Creative CommonsAttribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported

Get all the latest PokerNews updates on your social media outlets. Follow us on Twitter and find us on both Facebook and Google+!

  • Tags

    cash game strategytournament strategyTommy AngeloDavid SklanskyEd Millerpoker books
  • Related Players

    David SklanskyEd Miller

This poker skill test is the first and only of its kind. Our unique scoring system measures your overall poker skill level and assesses performance in 13 sub categories, revealing key strengths and weaknesses. Developed by poker professionals, this test is for no limit Hold'em cash games and tournaments (MTTs and SNGs).

Click here to take the test.

BLdSWtTRs (High stakes pro) 150

Taylor 'Green Plastic' Caby (High stakes pro) 143

Ryan Daut (High stakes pro, '07 WPT winner) 143

Bryan 'B_Buddy' Sumner (High stakes pro, recent WPT winner) 140

Levels

Dustin Dirksen (High stakes pro) 137

Levels

Eric 'p3achy_keen' Liu (High stakes pro) 137

Born2DogBaby (High stakes pro) 134

Alec 'traheho' Torelli (High stakes pro, 2nd '08 WSOP $10K HU) 133

Ben 'Sauce123' Sulsky (High stakes pro) 132

Vanessa 'fslexcduck' Selbst (High stakes pro, '08 WSOP bracelet winner) 131

James 'Mig.com' Mackey (High stakes pro, '07 WSOP bracelet winner) 131

Jason 'KRANTZ' Rosenkrantz (High stakes pro) 131

Thinking Poker

Noah 'Exclusive' Boeken (High stakes tournament pro) 129

Matt Matros (High stakes tournament pro) 127

'My score was 143, which was better than 97.2% of people that took the test and it claimed I was a 'High Stakes Pro,' but 2 points shy of a 'Poker Genius.' At this point in time, I would say that is pretty accurate.'
--Taylor Caby, high stakes pro 'Extremely good test. I agree with almost every answer.'
--BLdSWtTRs, high stakes pro 'This poker skills test gave me a really honest assessment of my play. I think we all want to test higher than the limits we've actually been successful at, I certainly was hoping to, but this pegged me very well. If someone said to me, 'I can't seem to win. My opponents keep sucking out on me,' I would recommend this test as an objective assessment of their current status.'
--Clark, mid stakes cash pro 'This test is awesome. The first poker IQ test I've taken that wasn't a total joke. Some genuinely difficult situations.'
--Wild Bill, high stakes pro 'Fun waste of an hour... almost as fun as playing.'
--Jason, recreational player 'I used to think there was no way to to create a poker skill test because situations are so variable, but each question outlines enough of each situation such that a reasonable player can logically pick the right answer. The test was very comprehensive and well designed -- a lot better than I thought it would be.'
--Eric 'p3achy_keen' Liu, high stakes pro 'I'll definitely be back for donkey test two.'Levels
--Jason 'Pr1nnyraid' Rosenkrantz, high stakes pro 'It's a great test. I like it.'
--Borntarun, high stakes pro 'While I was taking the test I didn't think it was a very good one. I changed my mind after seeing the results and that the areas my score was pretty low in are indeed the weaker parts of my game.'
--Bob, internet player 'My poorest IQ score was for tournaments. I think the test is correct -- I don't really play tournaments. Sometimes I play them, but honestly I'm losing more than I'm winning.'
--Adam, internet player 'This is actually quite a neat little test. Definitely biased towards NL Cash, but I like how the test was written, it requires some critical thinking for sure.'
--Chris, medium stakes tournament player 'Ur test is bullshit 91 iq yaa right fu.'
--Tom, Italian tournament player

'Really stupid test poker is situational not structured this test gives no insight into what a good player is there is no way I'm only a 89 its just stupid.'
--Sean, call station



Live Poker HUD
Donkey Tracker
Stone Glasgow
Suited Aces
Liquid Poker

Hands

Zynga Poker Levels And Ranks


© 2005 -2021 Lyric Duveyoung All rights reserved